Accident Exchange scores spot rate court win
December 1st, 2011Case centres on allegations of fraudulent spot rate setting
Accident Exchange has won the latest stage in its long-running legal battle with defunct rate-setting company Autofocus over allegations that it manipulated credit hire spot rate data.
Lord Justice Aiken ruled in the Court of Appeal yesterday that the accident management company could appeal on four cases, in which it alleges that Autofocus provided evidence on credit hire spot rates that was incorrect and potentially fraudulent.
Autofocus supplied a number of motor insurers with reports on credit hire rates until it went into administration last year.
The cases in question are William Craig Thomson v S Landsdowne; Sharon Seatroy v D Oliver; Glen Sharples v Peter Brown and Puru Shothaman v Isran Malik.
In all four cases, which were heard yesterday, Aiken ruled that there was sufficient merit for Accident Exchange to appeal.
Tags: Accident Exchange, Rate, Spot Rate